We don’t have infinite time. The amount of reading attention any new book must compete with is getting progressively smaller. So we have to be selective.
It’s basic math.
Robert E. Howard read Edgar Rice Burroughs and Jack London and H. Rider Haggard (and many, many authors besides, but bear with me as I make this point).
Michael Moorcock read Howard and his contemporaries C.L. Moore and Clark Ashton Smith… but is obligated to read ERB and London and Haggard.
Writers today read Moorcock and his contemporaries Karl Edward Wagner and Jack Vance and Poul Anderson. But also should read Howard and Moore and Smith … and ERB and London and Haggard.
The demands on new generations of readers multiply. What about readers and writers three generations from now?
Oh, and we all must read the classics. Shakespeare and Milton and Homer and Hemingway.
Make sure you read outside your genre. One should read history, too.
The accumulated reading, generation on generation, cannot continue. The math doesn’t add up. How many books can anyone read in a lifetime?
Some books must fall by the wayside.
This is just the beginning of the problem. We have many more demands on our attention than previous generations. Movies, TV, video games, TTRPGs, YouTube, doom scrolling, etc., all compete for our attention during “free” time. And despite all the breathless predictions of the techno utopians, we don’t seem to be working any fewer hours.
That means we’ve got choices to make. As you get older, you realize you cannot fritter your time away. It’s far too precious.
So, what are we to do?
My advice: Read what you want. Just read, as long as its not Reddit forums or Twitter threads.
Read new sword-and-sorcery or read the classics. Read comic books, or graphic novels. Just make sure it’s something someone has created, with care.
Don’t listen to what other people think. I don’t. Because I’ve read enough to spot illogic and ad hominem and the rest.
Just because a book is old, published 60 or 80 or 400 years ago, does not render it out of date. C.S. Lewis tells us to rid yourself of “the uncritical acceptance of the intellectual climate common to our own age and the assumption that whatever has gone out of date is on that account discredited. You must find out why it went out of date. Was it ever refuted (and if so by whom, where, and how conclusively) or did it merely die away as fashions do? If the latter, this tells us nothing about its truth or falsehood.”
And our age is prone to its own illusions.
Anything still in print 60 years after it was published is probably worth your time. Because it survived the test of time. The books that influenced your favorite author(s) are probably worth reading too, even if out of print.
But don’t feel obligated to plow through classics that are going to kill your love of reading, either.
Read what interests you, and carry that fire against public opinion. Which is often shit.
That’s another benefit of reading widely and deeply—read enough good stuff and you’ll develop a sensitive and accurate bullshit detection meter.